By in History —

Prescription for Profit: When Doctors Endorsed Danger

Before strict regulations, medical experts frequently endorsed products we now know are dangerous. From cigarettes touted for throat health to cocaine drops for teething babies, marketing and commercial interests often triumphed over consumer safety, revealing a startling chapter in medical history.

Picture an advertisement from the 1940s. A man in a crisp white coat, a stethoscope draped confidently around his neck, smiles reassuringly at the reader. In his hand is not a prescription pad, but a freshly lit cigarette. The caption reads, “More Doctors Smoke CAMELS Than Any Other Cigarette.” It’s an image so absurd by today’s standards that it feels like satire, yet it was a cornerstone of one of the most successful, and insidious, advertising campaigns in history. This wasn't an isolated incident; it was the hallmark of an era where the most trusted figures in society were paid to peddle poison, blurring the lines between medical advice and corporate marketing.

The Authority of the White Coat

In the first half of the 20th century, the physician held a position of almost unimpeachable authority. Scientific and medical advancements were accelerating, and the public looked to doctors as beacons of knowledge and progress. Advertisers quickly recognized that a doctor's endorsement was the ultimate seal of approval. If a doctor said a product was safe, or even beneficial, who was the average consumer to argue? This immense public trust became a commodity, one that corporations were eager to purchase. Tobacco companies, in particular, pioneered the strategy of leveraging medical authority to quell growing public anxiety about the health effects of their products.

“A Mildness Test for Your Throat”

As concerns about smoker’s cough and throat irritation began to surface, tobacco companies didn't just ignore them—they co-opted them. R.J. Reynolds launched its infamous “More Doctors” campaign for Camel cigarettes, conducting surveys of physicians at medical conventions (often after gifting them cartons of cigarettes) to produce their headline statistic. Their competitor, Philip Morris, went a step further, sponsoring its own medical research and publishing the results in medical journals to “prove” that their brand was less irritating. As historian Robert K. Jackler, who co-founded Stanford Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising, noted:

“The public was starting to have some concerns about the health effects of cigarettes, so the ads were a way of reassuring the public that if a doctor smokes, it must be safe.”

These campaigns created a smokescreen of scientific legitimacy. Advertisements featured doctors in labs, inspecting tobacco leaves, and calmly enjoying a cigarette during a break. The infamous “T-Zone” (T for Taste, T for Throat) campaign encouraged consumers to conduct their own 30-day test to see how “mild” and flavorful Camels were, a clever way to turn a health concern into a marketing feature.

A Medicine Cabinet of Maladies

Tobacco was far from the only dangerous product to receive a professional blessing. The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw a boom in patent medicines, many of which contained shocking ingredients. Mrs. Winslow's Soothing Syrup, a popular remedy for teething infants, was laced with morphine and alcohol. Cocaine toothache drops were sold over the counter, promising instant relief for children and adults alike. Heroin was marketed by Bayer as a non-addictive cough suppressant, a supposedly safer alternative to morphine. Perhaps most bizarre was the era's brief love affair with radiation. Products like Radithor, a tonic containing radium dissolved in water, were promoted as miracle elixirs that could cure everything from arthritis to impotence. Its most famous user, industrialist Eben Byers, drank nearly 1,400 bottles before his jaw, and much of his skeleton, disintegrated. These products weren't just sold on the fringes; they were mainstream, their claims often bolstered by testimonials from supposed experts.

Modern Malpractice

It’s tempting to view this history as a relic of a more naive time, but the strategy of using expert authority to sell a potentially harmful product has never disappeared. The phrase “9 out of 10 dentists recommend” still echoes in our minds, a direct descendant of the tactics used by tobacco companies. A more sobering modern parallel can be found in the opioid crisis. In the late 1990s and 2000s, Purdue Pharma marketed OxyContin to doctors as a breakthrough in pain management with a low risk of addiction. The company funded studies, sponsored medical conferences, and paid doctors to act as speakers, creating a narrative of safety that flew in the face of emerging evidence. The playbook was hauntingly familiar: use the credibility of the medical community to oversell a product's benefits while downplaying its profound dangers. The resulting epidemic of addiction and overdose serves as a tragic reminder that the conflict between profit and public health is an ongoing battle. The white coat remains a powerful marketing tool, and the need for critical consumption of “expert” advice is as crucial as ever.

Sources