England's Slippery Ledger: When the Rent Was Paid in Eels

In medieval England, the value of land wasn't measured in gold but in writhing barrels of eels. This forgotten chapter reveals how a slippery fish became a more stable currency than coin, until the very rivers that sustained it ran dry of their silver bounty.

The Accountant and the Abyss

Imagine a medieval bookkeeper, not clinking through coins, but making a tally against a writhing, slippery mass. This wasn't an anomaly; it was the backbone of an economy. In the wetlands of the Fens, Ramsey Abbey’s annual accounts didn’t just list shillings and pence. They listed eels—up to 60,000 of them a year, rendered as rent from tenants on their lands. For centuries across England, from the crowning of Norman kings to the dawn of the Tudors, the European eel was not merely food. It was a standard, a unit of value, a currency far more reliable than the kingdom’s often-debased silver coins.

A Fish Fit for a Feudal System

Why eels? The answer lies in a perfect storm of biology and theology. In a devoutly Christian society, the calendar was pocked with fast days, and the 40 days of Lent forbade the consumption of meat. Eels, fatty and rich, were a welcome substitute. But their true value was in their practicality. Unlike other fish, eels could be transported live for days in barrels with a bit of water. They were ubiquitous, thriving in nearly every river and marsh. Most importantly, they could be smoked, salted, or pickled, transforming a perishable good into a stable asset that could last through the winter.

This reliability made them an ideal form of payment in the feudal system. Landowners, from local lords to the crown itself, collected them as ‘eel-rents.’ The Domesday Book of 1086, William the Conqueror’s great survey of his new kingdom, records tributes and payments amounting to more than half a million eels annually. Transactions were standardized into units like the ‘stick,’ a skewer of 25 eels. Payments were immense and specific: the village of Harmston in Lincolnshire owed its lord 26,275 eels each year. For a time, the rivers were a seemingly infinite mint, issuing a silver, wriggling currency from the mud.

The Unseen Infrastructure

An entire infrastructure rose to support this economy. Intricate V-shaped stone walls, known as eel-weirs, funnelled migrating eels into nets and traps. The sheer volume of eels pulled from rivers like the Thames and the Ouse is difficult to comprehend today. It was a harvest as vital as any field of grain, a resource so abundant that it seemed inexhaustible. It funded monasteries, paid for armies, and filled the bellies of peasants and kings alike. The eel was, in every sense, a pillar of medieval life.

The Current Fades

No single decree ended the age of eel-rents. Instead, the system slowly starved. The very rivers that were the source of this wealth began to change. As the Middle Ages waned, landlords seeking new revenue streams built mills and dams, obstructing the migratory paths crucial for eel reproduction. Waterways were altered, marshes were drained for farmland, and slowly, the once-teeming rivers grew quieter. By the 17th century, eel-rents were a historical curiosity, a strange clause in old contracts. The Industrial Revolution delivered the final blow, its pollution turning vibrant rivers into toxic drains where few eels could survive.

The story of the eel-rent is more than a historical oddity. It’s a parable of ecological accounting. The medieval English understood the value of the eel in a tangible, economic way. They built a system around its predictable abundance. We have since forgotten that value. Today, the European eel is critically endangered, its population having plummeted by over 95%. The same forces that dismantled the eel economy—habitat destruction and human alteration of waterways—have now pushed the species to the brink of oblivion. The empty ledgers of long-dead monks serve as a quiet warning: a resource only seems infinite until it’s gone.

Sources

Loading more posts...