in
History
—
Human Cargo, Calculated Murder: The Insurance Fraud That Exposed the Horors of the Slave Trade
In 1781, the crew of the British slave ship Zong murdered over 130 enslaved Africans by throwing them overboard, then attempted to claim insurance money for their 'lost cargo.' The resulting legal case exposed the horrific brutality and commercial nature of the transatlantic slave trade.
An Unspeakable Voyage
The transatlantic slave trade is a chapter of history defined by its inhumanity, but some events are so horrific they stand out as potent symbols of its depravity. The story of the slave ship Zong is one such event. In September 1781, the Zong set sail from Accra (modern-day Ghana) for Jamaica, its hold crammed with 442 enslaved Africans—more than double the number the vessel could safely carry. The voyage was plagued by disease and death from the start, but a catastrophic navigational error would soon turn the grim journey into a scene of calculated mass murder.
A Calculation of Cruelty
After mistaking Jamaica for the French colony of Saint-Domingue, Captain Luke Collingwood continued sailing west for weeks, wasting precious time and, crucially, potable water. As supplies dwindled and more enslaved people and crew members fell ill, the captain and his officers made a monstrous decision rooted in the cold logic of commerce. Under maritime insurance principles of the time, known as 'general average,' a captain could jettison cargo to save the rest of the ship and its contents during an emergency. The insurers would then have to reimburse the owners for the 'lost' cargo.
The Zong's owners had insured the lives of the enslaved Africans. If the captives died on board from disease or starvation—a so-called 'natural death'—the financial loss would fall on the ship's owners. However, if they were thrown overboard to save the ship from a perceived lack of water, their deaths could be claimed as an insurable loss. For the crew of the Zong, the enslaved were not people; they were cargo to be managed on a ledger of profit and loss.
The Massacre at Sea
On November 29, 1781, the crew began the slaughter. They seized 54 women and children and threw them, one by one, into the Atlantic Ocean. Two days later, on December 1, they murdered 42 enslaved men in the same manner. Over the next few days, another 26 were forced overboard. In a final, heartbreaking act of defiance and despair, ten more captives threw themselves into the sea rather than submit to their murderers. In total, more than 130 people were killed. Shortly after the massacre, the ship was met with torrential rains, refilling their water casks and proving the 'necessity' of their actions a complete lie.
Justice for Cargo, Not for People
Upon the Zong's arrival in Jamaica, the ship's owners, the Gregson slave-trading syndicate of Liverpool, filed an insurance claim for the value of the murdered Africans. The insurer refused to pay, and the case, Gregson v Gilbert, went to court in 1783. The initial trial was not about murder, but about insurance liability. The arguments made in court laid bare the legal dehumanization of enslaved people. The Solicitor-General, John Lee, arguing for the shipowners, stated:
What is this claim that human people have been thrown overboard? This is a case of chattels or goods. It is a case of throwing over goods; for to this purpose, and the purpose of the insurance, they are as goods and property...
The jury initially found in favor of the shipowners. The insurers appealed.
The Spark of Abolition
News of the trial reached the ears of Olaudah Equiano, a prominent Black abolitionist and former slave. He brought the case to the attention of Granville Sharp, another leading abolitionist. Horrified, Sharp tried to have the crew prosecuted for mass murder, but the authorities refused. Undeterred, Sharp used the case as a powerful tool to expose the barbarity of the slave trade to the public. The Zong massacre was no longer a simple insurance dispute; it became a symbol of the entire rotten system.
During the appeal hearing, Lord Chief Justice Mansfield presided. While he ultimately overturned the original verdict and ruled against the shipowners, his reasoning remained chillingly detached from any concept of human rights. He denied the claim because the captain's navigational error created the water shortage, meaning there was no legal ground for jettisoning 'cargo.' His summary of the affair was stark:
The Case was as if the Slaves were Horses.
Though no one was ever held accountable for the murders, the Zong massacre became a turning point. It galvanized the abolitionist movement, providing an undeniable example of the horrors that commercial greed could justify. The event inspired J. M. W. Turner's famous 1840 painting, The Slave Ship (Slavers Throwing Overboard the Dead and Dying, Typhoon Coming On), forever cementing the atrocity in the cultural consciousness. It remains a gut-wrenching lesson on how easily systems can legalize and monetize cruelty by stripping people of their humanity.