in
History
—
The Drowning Gowns: How Victorian Women Swam in Weighted Wool Dresses
In 19th-century Europe, women's swimwear consisted of heavy wool gowns with weights sewn into the hems. This impractical measure ensured modesty by preventing the fabric from floating, but posed a serious drowning risk and stood in stark contrast to the athletic needs of early female Olympians.
Imagine heading to the beach, not with a lightweight bikini, but with a full-length, high-necked, long-sleeved dress made of wool or flannel. Now, imagine sewing lead weights into the hem of that dress before taking a dip. This wasn't a bizarre fashion statement; it was the standard for women's swimwear in 19th-century Western Europe, a cumbersome solution to a problem of public morality.
The Reign of Modesty
The Victorian era was governed by strict social codes, and modesty was paramount. The idea of a woman revealing the shape of her legs in public was scandalous. To navigate this, beach culture involved elaborate rituals. Women would often change inside a 'bathing machine'—a small wooden hut on wheels—which would be rolled directly into the water. They would then emerge into the sea, already submerged, their bodies hidden from prying eyes on the shore.
The bathing costume itself was an extension of this modesty. It was essentially a dress, complete with bloomers or trousers worn underneath, designed to conceal the female form entirely. But fabric, especially buoyant wool, has a tendency to float in water, threatening to expose a woman's ankles or calves. The solution was as simple as it was dangerous: sew weights into the hems to keep the garment pulled down.
A Perilous Pursuit of Decency
While the weights solved the 'problem' of a floating skirt, they created a far more serious one. Wool can absorb a significant amount of water, becoming incredibly heavy. A waterlogged wool gown, now anchored by lead weights, transformed from a piece of clothing into a potential drowning machine. It severely restricted movement, making actual swimming nearly impossible and turning a simple paddle into a hazardous activity. This bulky, heavy attire was designed for bathing and wading, not for athletic performance.
A Sea Change and the Dawn of Competition
The turn of the 20th century brought with it a shift in attitudes. Health, fitness, and sport became more popular, and women wanted to do more than just bob in the shallows. When women's swimming was introduced to the Olympic Games in 1912, the absurdity of competing in weighted dresses became undeniable. A new kind of swimwear was needed.
Australian swimmer Annette Kellerman became a pivotal figure in this revolution. A professional swimmer and vaudeville star, she challenged the restrictive norms by adopting a form-fitting, one-piece suit that ended above the knee—a design she had adapted from men's racing suits. Her advocacy for practical swimwear was not without consequence; in 1907, she was arrested on a Boston beach for indecent exposure. Kellerman, however, remained defiant, famously arguing:
I want to swim. And I can't swim wearing more stuff than you could hang on a clothesline.
Her activism and the growing popularity of swimming as a sport slowly eroded the old standards. Her daring one-piece, once considered scandalous, became the blueprint for modern women's swimwear, paving the way for garments that prioritized movement and athleticism over mandated modesty.
From Wool to Lycra
The journey from weighted wool gowns to the high-tech, hydrodynamic swimsuits worn by today's Olympians is more than just a fashion story. It reflects a profound shift in society's view of women's bodies, their freedom, and their place in the world of sports. The heavy hems of the 19th century serve as a stark reminder of the physical and social weights that have been shed over time, allowing women not just to swim, but to compete and excel.