in
History
—
The Sausage Scandal of 1522: How a Lenten Meal Ignited the Swiss Reformation
In 1522, Zürich printer Christoph Froschauer served sausages during Lent. Pastor Huldrych Zwingli defended this act, arguing from scripture that fasting was a choice, not a mandate. This 'Affair of the Sausages' openly challenged Catholic authority and sparked the Reformation in Zürich.
History often turns on grand battles and royal decrees, but sometimes, it pivots on something as simple as a sausage. In Zürich, 1522, a defiant act of dining during the solemn season of Lent became the spark that ignited the Swiss Reformation, a moment now famously known as the "Affair of the Sausages."
A Deliberate Act of Defiance
The scene was the workshop of Christoph Froschauer, a prominent printer in Zürich. It was the first Sunday of Lent, a period when all Christians were forbidden by the Catholic Church from eating meat. After completing a new edition of the Epistles of Saint Paul, Froschauer and his workers were exhausted. He decided to serve them smoked sausages—a clear and public violation of the Lenten fast. This was no secret indulgence; it was a calculated demonstration. Among the guests was Huldrych Zwingli, the people's priest at the Grossmünster church and the burgeoning leader of the Swiss Reformation. While Zwingli himself did not partake in the meal, his presence gave the act intellectual and spiritual weight. He was there to defend the principle, not just satisfy a craving.
Scripture Over Tradition
The act caused an immediate uproar. It was a direct challenge to the authority of the Church, and the Bishop of Constance was quickly informed. Froschauer was arrested. In response, Zwingli took to the pulpit and delivered a sermon titled "Regarding the Choice and Freedom of Foods." His argument was a cornerstone of the Reformation, borrowed from Martin Luther: sola scriptura, or "by scripture alone." Zwingli argued that the laws of fasting were man-made, not divinely ordained. Since the Bible does not prohibit eating meat during Lent, Christians should be free to choose whether to fast or not. He powerfully articulated this freedom of conscience:
If you want to fast, do so; if you do not want to eat meat, don't eat it; but allow Christians a free choice.
He contended that these man-made rules distracted from true piety and were often used by the Church to control the populace. For Zwingli and his followers, if a rule could not be found in the Bible, it could not be considered binding on a Christian's soul.
The Fallout: From a Printer's Shop to Public Policy
The Zürich city council was caught between the powerful Bishop of Constance and the increasingly popular Zwingli. Initially, they compromised. Froschauer was released, but the council issued a mandate that the rules of Lent should not be broken, at least for the time being, to maintain public order. However, the sausage had been eaten, and the debate could not be contained. The Affair of the Sausages forced a public reckoning. It led directly to the Zürich Disputations, formal debates where Zwingli skillfully defended his reformist positions based on scripture. Victorious in these debates, Zwingli convinced the city council to officially adopt the principles of the Reformation. Over the next few years, Zürich formally broke from the Catholic Church, removed icons from its churches, and translated the Bible into the vernacular. The protest that began with a piece of sausage had fundamentally reshaped the city's religious and political landscape.
Today, the event is often recalled with a sense of humor—a 'food fight' that changed history. But beneath the surface, it represents a profound shift in Western thought: the elevation of individual conscience and scriptural authority over institutional tradition. It serves as a potent reminder that revolutionary change can begin not with a sword, but with a simple, deliberate act of defiance.