in
Sports & Games
—
Perfect Endings: The Surprising World of Correspondence Chess Where Computers Are Legal Teammates
In the slow-paced world of correspondence chess, players are often allowed to use endgame tablebases. These databases provide perfect moves in the final stages, shifting the game's focus from pure calculation to deep strategic planning and man-machine collaboration.
Imagine a high-stakes chess match. Two brilliant minds, locked in a silent battle of intellect and will. For most of us, this image is sacred—a pure contest of human ingenuity. But what if I told you that in one of the oldest forms of the game, players are not only allowed but often expected to use a perfect, all-knowing computer brain for the final, critical moves? Welcome to the fascinating world of correspondence chess.
A Game Played Through the Mail (and Email)
First, what is correspondence chess? Unlike over-the-board tournaments with ticking clocks, correspondence games are played over long periods, with players sending their moves by mail, email, or server. A single game can take months or even years to complete. This extended timeframe has always allowed for deep thought and analysis, but the rise of computers introduced a new dimension to the game.
The Ultimate Cheat Sheet: Endgame Tablebases
In the late 1990s, the International Correspondence Chess Federation (ICCF) made a groundbreaking decision. They began to officially permit the use of 'endgame tablebases'. An endgame tablebase is not a chess engine like Stockfish that thinks and calculates possibilities. Instead, it's a massive, pre-calculated database that has completely 'solved' chess endgames with a limited number of pieces (currently up to seven). For any given position in its database, a tablebase doesn't just suggest a good move; it provides the mathematically perfect, optimal move that guarantees the quickest win or secures a draw if possible. It is a database of absolute truth.
But... Isn't That Cheating?
This is the immediate reaction for most chess enthusiasts. If a computer tells you the perfect move, where is the skill? The answer lies in how the nature of the competition has evolved. The ICCF and its players decided that the test of skill should not be in the rote calculation of a solved part of the game. A correspondence player reflected on this shift in thinking:
The challenge in correspondence chess has shifted from 'who can calculate better' to 'who has the superior strategic understanding to guide the game toward a known, winning position'. The endgame is just one part of that path, and it happens to be a solved one.
By allowing tablebases, the game’s focus shifts dramatically. It’s no longer about avoiding a simple blunder in a complex king-and-pawn endgame. Instead, the real battle happens much earlier in the middlegame. A player's skill is now measured by their ability to evaluate complex positions and steer the game towards an endgame that the tablebase confirms is a win, even if that win is 50 perfect moves away.
The Modern 'Centaur' Player
The modern correspondence player is a 'centaur'—a hybrid of human intuition and machine precision, a term popularized by grandmaster Garry Kasparov. Their job is to act as a project manager. They use powerful chess engines to analyze the unfathomably complex middlegame and their own strategic understanding to choose the most promising path. The endgame tablebase is just one tool in their arsenal, a powerful guarantee that if they can successfully navigate the chaos of the middlegame, a perfect finish awaits them. This transforms the game from a test of tactical calculation to a profound test of strategic planning, research, and machine-assisted analysis. It hasn't destroyed the spirit of chess; it has simply created a new, fascinating frontier for human competition.