The Unlikely History of 'OK': How a Boston Newspaper Joke Conquered the Planet

The most successful word on Earth began as a joke. In 1839 Boston, 'OK' was a witty, misspelled abbreviation for 'oll korrect' that should have vanished. Instead, a presidential campaign and the telegraph transformed it into a global symbol of agreement.

A Joke Between Friends

It is arguably the most successful word on Earth. Spoken, typed, or gestured, 'OK' is a universally understood signal of assent, acknowledgment, or simple functionality. It bridges languages and cultures with an effortless clarity that feels ancient, essential, and inevitable. But this global titan of vocabulary was never meant to be. It began as a fleeting, silly joke inside a Boston newspaper office.

The 1830s were a strange time for American humor, particularly among the young, educated editors of Boston. A linguistic fad swept through their circles: the deliberate, comical misspelling of common phrases, which were then reduced to their initials. 'KG' stood for 'know go,' 'KY' for 'know yuse,' and 'OW' for 'oll wright.' It was an inside joke, a way for the clever to wink at each other in print. On March 23, 1839, Charles Gordon Greene, the editor of the Boston Morning Post, deployed the trend while making a dry editorial jab. Tucked away in his column was a new abbreviation:

...he of the Journal, and his train-band, would have the 'contribution box,' et ceteras, o.k. — all correct — and cause the corks to fly, like sparks, upward.

There it was: 'o.k.' for 'oll korrect.' It was a throwaway line, one of dozens of such acronyms destined to fade as quickly as they appeared. By all rights, 'OK' should have died right there, a forgotten piece of 19th-century slang.

From Punchline to Platform

A year later, the Boston joke was unexpectedly thrust onto the national stage by the 1840 presidential election. The incumbent, President Martin Van Buren, was a native of Kinderhook, New York. This geographical fact had earned him the nickname 'Old Kinderhook.' As his supporters organized for his re-election campaign, they formed clubs to rally voters. Seizing on the catchy initials, they called themselves the 'O.K. Club.'

The Campaign for 'OK'

Suddenly, the obscure abbreviation was plastered on signs, chanted at rallies, and printed in newspapers across the country. 'Vote for OK' became a powerful, if ambiguous, slogan. Van Buren's supporters retrofitted the meaning to their candidate, while the opposition Whig party tried to weaponize it, concocting their own derisive definitions like 'Out of Kash,' 'Orfully Konfused,' or 'Oll Killed.' The political battle raged, but in doing so, it burned the two simple letters into the American lexicon. Martin Van Buren lost the election, but the two-letter word he inadvertently championed won a permanent place in the language.

The Word That Wired the World

Politics gave 'OK' fame, but technology gave it immortality. As the telegraph network began to stitch the country together in the mid-1840s, operators needed a fast, unambiguous way to confirm receipt of a message. 'OK' was perfect. It was short, phonetically distinct, and unlikely to be confused with other signals. It became the standard, neutral acknowledgment that a message had been successfully transmitted and understood. From the telegraph office, it bled into official documents, business correspondence, and everyday life. Its original meaning of 'oll korrect' was almost entirely forgotten, replaced by a new, more vital role: the universal signal that all systems are working.

An Accidental Triumph

For nearly a century, the true origin of 'OK' was lost. Theories proliferated, attributing it to the Choctaw word 'okeh,' a Scottish expression 'och aye,' or even a biscuit maker named 'Orrin Kendall.' It took the painstaking work of a Columbia University etymologist, Allen Walker Read, who in the 1960s sifted through dusty archives of old newspapers to piece together the improbable journey from Boston joke to political slogan to global standard. The story of 'OK' is a testament to the chaotic and unpredictable nature of language. It reveals that the most functional and essential parts of our world are sometimes born not from sober design, but from a forgotten moment of pure, trivial fun.

Sources

Loading more posts...